A common question arises: if we already have a hub in our IoT network, which is a relatively powerful device, why do we need a remote server? This question is particularly relevant for personal setups like smart home automation, where privacy is a priority. Let's explore the differences and use cases for local and remote servers in IoT systems.
For individual users, a smart home setup is a unique, private system. However, for service providers offering commercial IoT solutions, every home is just one of many. Managing these systems via a centralized remote server offers significant advantages:
In custom IoT solutions, particularly for personal or small-scale applications, you may choose to use a local server. This setup keeps your data within your private network and eliminates the need for constant internet connectivity. However, fully local solutions are typically feasible only for smaller systems, such as:
Benefits of a Local Server:
For larger or more complex IoT systems, a remote server is almost always necessary. Even if data privacy is a concern, you can opt for an on-premises remote server, such as a Linux server hosted within your organization, to keep data private while benefiting from the power of remote computation.
Benefits of a Remote Server:
Drawbacks of a Remote Server:
For example, in a Fish Feeder System, end devices in the sea often face unstable connections due to weather conditions. To address this, automation scripts can be saved locally on the devices, allowing them to operate offline if the connection is lost. The remote server in such cases is used to create and modify these scripts and store system data for analysis.
While local servers provide privacy and independence, remote servers offer scalability, flexibility, and centralized management. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the system, with most modern IoT solutions striking a balance by using both local and remote resources.